A continuation of commit 2825f10b7f.
Add O_PATH compatibility support for flistxattr(). This allows
a process to list out all the extended attributes associated with
O_PATH file descriptors.
Change-Id: Ie2285ac7ad2e4eac427ddba6c2d182d41b130f75
Support O_PATH file descriptors when handling fgetxattr and fsetxattr.
This avoids requiring file read access to pull extended attributes.
This is needed to support O_PATH file descriptors when calling
SELinux's fgetfilecon() call. In particular, this allows the querying
and setting of SELinux file context by using something like the following
code:
int dirfd = open("/path/to/dir", O_DIRECTORY);
int fd = openat(dirfd, "file", O_PATH | O_NOFOLLOW);
char *context;
fgetfilecon(fd, &context);
This change was motivated by a comment in
https://android-review.googlesource.com/#/c/152680/1/toys/posix/ls.c
Change-Id: Ic0cdf9f9dd0e35a63b44a4c4a08400020041eddf
This doesn't affect code like Chrome that correctly ignores EINTR on
close, makes code that tries TEMP_FAILURE_RETRY work (where before it might
have closed a different fd and appeared to succeed, or had a bogus EBADF),
and makes "goto fail" code work (instead of mistakenly assuming that EINTR
means that the close failed).
Who loses? Anyone actively trying to detect that they caught a signal while
in close(2). I don't think those people exist, and I think they have better
alternatives available.
Bug: https://code.google.com/p/chromium/issues/detail?id=269623
Bug: http://b/20501816
Change-Id: I11e2f66532fe5d1b0082b2433212e24bdda8219b
The kernel system call faccessat() does not have any flags arguments,
so passing flags to the kernel is currently ignored.
Fix the kernel system call so that no flags argument is passed in.
Ensure that we don't support AT_SYMLINK_NOFOLLOW. This non-POSIX
(http://pubs.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/9699919799/functions/access.html)
flag is a glibc extension, and has non-intuitive, error prone behavior.
For example, consider the following code:
symlink("foo.is.dangling", "foo");
if (faccessat(AT_FDCWD, "foo", R_OK, AT_SYMLINK_NOFOLLOW) == 0) {
int fd = openat(AT_FDCWD, "foo", O_RDONLY | O_NOFOLLOW);
}
The faccessat() call in glibc will return true, but an attempt to
open the dangling symlink will end up failing. GLIBC documents this
as returning the access mode of the symlink itself, which will
always return true for any symlink on Linux.
Some further discussions of this are at:
* http://lists.landley.net/pipermail/toybox-landley.net/2014-September/003617.html
* http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.linux.lib.musl.general/6952
AT_SYMLINK_NOFOLLOW seems broken by design. I suspect this is why this
function was never added to POSIX. (note that "access" is pretty much
broken by design too, since it introduces a race condition between
check and action). We shouldn't support this until it's clearly
documented by POSIX or we can have it produce intuitive results.
Don't support AT_EACCESS for now. Implementing it is complicated, and
pretty much useless on Android, since we don't have setuid binaries.
See http://git.musl-libc.org/cgit/musl/commit/?id=0a05eace163cee9b08571d2ff9d90f5e82d9c228
for how an implementation might look.
Bug: 18867827
Change-Id: I25b86c5020f3152ffa3ac3047f6c4152908d0e04
The overflow's actually in the generic C implementation of memchr.
While I'm here, let's switch our generic memrchr to the OpenBSD version too.
Bug: https://code.google.com/p/android/issues/detail?id=147048
Change-Id: I296ae06a1ee196d2c77c95a22f11ee4d658962da
In https://android-review.googlesource.com/#/c/127908/5/libc/SYSCALLS.TXT@116
Elliott said:
for LP64 these will be hidden. for LP32 we were cowards and left
them all public for compatibility (though i don't think we ever
dremeled to see whether it was needed). we don't have an easy
way to recognize additions, though, so we can't prevent adding
new turds.
Add a mechanism to prevent the adding of new turds, and use that
mechanism on the fchmod/fchmodat system calls.
Bug: 19233951
Change-Id: I98f98345970b631a379f348df57858f9fc3d57c0
Many libc functions have an option to not follow symbolic
links. This is useful to avoid security sensitive code
from inadvertantly following attacker supplied symlinks
and taking inappropriate action on files it shouldn't.
For example, open() has O_NOFOLLOW, chown() has
lchown(), stat() has lstat(), etc.
There is no such equivalent function for chmod(), such as lchmod().
To address this, POSIX introduced fchmodat(AT_SYMLINK_NOFOLLOW),
which is intended to provide a way to perform a chmod operation
which doesn't follow symlinks.
Currently, the Linux kernel doesn't implement AT_SYMLINK_NOFOLLOW.
In GLIBC, attempting to use the AT_SYMLINK_NOFOLLOW flag causes
fchmodat to return ENOTSUP. Details are in "man fchmodat".
Bionic currently differs from GLIBC in that AT_SYMLINK_NOFOLLOW
is silently ignored and treated as if the flag wasn't present.
This patch provides a userspace implementation of
AT_SYMLINK_NOFOLLOW for bionic. Using open(O_PATH | O_NOFOLLOW),
we can provide a way to atomically change the permissions on
files without worrying about race conditions.
As part of this change, we add support for fchmod on O_PATH
file descriptors, because it's relatively straight forward
and could be useful in the future.
The basic idea behind this implementation comes from
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14578 , specifically
comment #10.
Change-Id: I1eba0cdb2c509d9193ceecf28f13118188a3cfa7
They'd drifted slightly which led to a compilation error in toybox,
which was assuming pid_t was defined. arm and arm64 were picking it
up via <endian.h> but x86 wasn't.
Change-Id: I58401e6c0066959dfc3b305b020876aaf7074bbf
This change provides __restore/__restore_rt on x86 and __restore_rt on
x86_64 with unwinding information to be able to unwind through signal
frame via libgcc provided unwinding interface. See comments inlined for
more details.
Also remove the test that had a dependency on
__attribute__((cleanup(foo_cleanup))). It doesn't provide us with any
better test coverage than we have from the newer tests, and it doesn't
work well across a variety architectures (presumably because no one uses
this attribute in the real world).
Tested this on host via bionic-unit-tests-run-on-host on both x86 and
x86-64.
Bug: 17436734
Change-Id: I2f06814e82c8faa732cb4f5648868dc0fd2e5fe4
Signed-off-by: Pavel Chupin <pavel.v.chupin@intel.com>
Add the missing prototypes, fix the existing prototypes to use clockid_t
rather than int, fix clock_nanosleep's failure behavior, and add simple
tests.
Bug: 17644443
Bug: https://code.google.com/p/android/issues/detail?id=77372
Change-Id: I03fba369939403918abcabae9551a7123953d780
Signed-off-by: Haruki Hasegawa <h6a.h4i.0@gmail.com>
* LP32 should use sa_restorer too. gdb expects this, and future (>= 3.15) x86
kernels will apparently stop supporting the case where SA_RESTORER isn't
set.
* gdb and libunwind care about the exact instruction sequences, so we need to
modify the code slightly in a few cases to match what they're looking for.
* gdb also cares about the exact function names (for some architectures),
so we need to use __restore and __restore_rt rather than __sigreturn and
__rt_sigreturn.
* It's possible that we don't have a VDSO; dl_iterate_phdr shouldn't assume
that getauxval(AT_SYSINFO_EHDR) will return a non-null pointer.
This fixes unwinding through a signal handler in gdb for all architectures.
It doesn't fix libunwind for arm and arm64. I'll keep investigating that...
Bug: 17436734
Change-Id: Ic1ea1184db6655c5d96180dc07bcc09628e647cb
There are number of changes in the way IFUNC related relocations are done:
1. IRELATIVE relocations are now supported for x86/x86_64 and arm64.
2. IFUNC relocations are now relying on static linker to generate
them in correct order - this removes necessety of additional
relocation pass for ifuncs.
3. Related to 2: rela?.dyn relocations are preformed before .plt ones.
4. Ifunc are resolved on symbol lookup this approach allowed to avoid
mprotect(PROT_WRITE) call on r-x program segments.
Bug: 17399706
Bug: 17177284
Change-Id: I414dd3e82bd47cc03442c5dfc7c279949aec51ed
The use of the .hidden directive to avoid going via the PLT for
__set_errno had the side-effect of actually making __set_errno
hidden (which is odd because assembler directives don't usually
affect symbols defined in a different file --- you can't even
create a weak reference to a symbol that's defined in a different
file).
This change switches the system call stubs over to a new always-hidden
__set_errno_internal and has a visible __set_errno on LP32 just for
binary compatibility with old NDK apps.
(cherry-pick of 7efad83d430f4d824f2aaa75edea5106f6ff8aae.)
Bug: 17423135
Change-Id: I6b6d7a05dda85f923d22e5ffd169a91e23499b7b
On most architectures the kernel subtracts a random offset to the stack
pointer in create_elf_tables by calling arch_align_stack before writing
the auxval table and so on. On all but x86 this doesn't cause a problem
because the random offset is less than a page, but on x86 it's up to two
pages. This means that our old technique of rounding the stack pointer
doesn't work. (Our old implementation of that technique was wrong too.)
It's also incorrect to assume that the main thread's stack base and size
are constant. Likewise to assume that the main thread has a guard page.
The main thread is not like other threads.
This patch switches to reading /proc/self/maps (and checking RLIMIT_STACK)
whenever we're asked.
Bug: 17111575
Signed-off-by: Fengwei Yin <fengwei.yin@intel.com>
Change-Id: I1d4dbffe7bc7bda1d353c3a295dbf68d29f63158
Clean up the x86/x86_64 assembler. The motivator (other than reducing
confusion) was that asm.h incorrectly checked PIC rather than __PIC__.
Bug: 16823325
Change-Id: Iaa9d45009e93a4b31b719021c93ac221e336479b
In practice, with this implementation we never need to make a system call.
We get the main thread's tid (which is the same as our pid) back from
the set_tid_address system call we have to make during initialization.
A new pthread will have the same pid as its parent, and a fork child's
main (and only) thread will have a pid equal to its tid, which we get for
free from the kernel before clone returns.
The only time we'd actually have to make a getpid system call now is if
we take a signal during fork and the signal handler calls getpid. (That,
or we call getpid in the dynamic linker while it's still dealing with its
own relocations and hasn't even set up the main thread yet.)
Bug: 15387103
Change-Id: I6d4718ed0a5c912fc75b5f738c49a023dbed5189
