Specifically, use the argument to sigsetjmp as a flag in the buffer
to indicate whether or not the signal mask is valid.
Bug: 16918359
Change-Id: I5bb1f1220f14c105c6bc57e0c28c1dc366d1438f
Note that this doesn't address the fact that we don't save/restore the
real-time signals. But it does let us pass the tests we currently fail.
Bug: 16918359
Change-Id: I063a6926164289a71026a412da7f5dd2ca9a74b3
They'd drifted slightly which led to a compilation error in toybox,
which was assuming pid_t was defined. arm and arm64 were picking it
up via <endian.h> but x86 wasn't.
Change-Id: I58401e6c0066959dfc3b305b020876aaf7074bbf
Add the missing prototypes, fix the existing prototypes to use clockid_t
rather than int, fix clock_nanosleep's failure behavior, and add simple
tests.
Bug: 17644443
Bug: https://code.google.com/p/android/issues/detail?id=77372
Change-Id: I03fba369939403918abcabae9551a7123953d780
Signed-off-by: Haruki Hasegawa <h6a.h4i.0@gmail.com>
gdb was happy with what we had, but libgcc and libunwind weren't.
libgcc is happy with the kernel's restorer (because of the extra nop),
though libunwind looks like it's going to need code changes regardless.
We could make our restorer more like the kernel's one, but why bother
when we can just let the kernel supply the canonical one?
Bug: 17436734
Change-Id: I330fa5e68f23b1cf8133aa552896657b0b873ed3
* LP32 should use sa_restorer too. gdb expects this, and future (>= 3.15) x86
kernels will apparently stop supporting the case where SA_RESTORER isn't
set.
* gdb and libunwind care about the exact instruction sequences, so we need to
modify the code slightly in a few cases to match what they're looking for.
* gdb also cares about the exact function names (for some architectures),
so we need to use __restore and __restore_rt rather than __sigreturn and
__rt_sigreturn.
* It's possible that we don't have a VDSO; dl_iterate_phdr shouldn't assume
that getauxval(AT_SYSINFO_EHDR) will return a non-null pointer.
This fixes unwinding through a signal handler in gdb for all architectures.
It doesn't fix libunwind for arm and arm64. I'll keep investigating that...
Bug: 17436734
Change-Id: Ic1ea1184db6655c5d96180dc07bcc09628e647cb
There are number of changes in the way IFUNC related relocations are done:
1. IRELATIVE relocations are now supported for x86/x86_64 and arm64.
2. IFUNC relocations are now relying on static linker to generate
them in correct order - this removes necessety of additional
relocation pass for ifuncs.
3. Related to 2: rela?.dyn relocations are preformed before .plt ones.
4. Ifunc are resolved on symbol lookup this approach allowed to avoid
mprotect(PROT_WRITE) call on r-x program segments.
Bug: 17399706
Bug: 17177284
Change-Id: I414dd3e82bd47cc03442c5dfc7c279949aec51ed
The use of the .hidden directive to avoid going via the PLT for
__set_errno had the side-effect of actually making __set_errno
hidden (which is odd because assembler directives don't usually
affect symbols defined in a different file --- you can't even
create a weak reference to a symbol that's defined in a different
file).
This change switches the system call stubs over to a new always-hidden
__set_errno_internal and has a visible __set_errno on LP32 just for
binary compatibility with old NDK apps.
(cherry-pick of 7efad83d430f4d824f2aaa75edea5106f6ff8aae.)
Bug: 17423135
Change-Id: I6b6d7a05dda85f923d22e5ffd169a91e23499b7b
On most architectures the kernel subtracts a random offset to the stack
pointer in create_elf_tables by calling arch_align_stack before writing
the auxval table and so on. On all but x86 this doesn't cause a problem
because the random offset is less than a page, but on x86 it's up to two
pages. This means that our old technique of rounding the stack pointer
doesn't work. (Our old implementation of that technique was wrong too.)
It's also incorrect to assume that the main thread's stack base and size
are constant. Likewise to assume that the main thread has a guard page.
The main thread is not like other threads.
This patch switches to reading /proc/self/maps (and checking RLIMIT_STACK)
whenever we're asked.
Bug: 17111575
Signed-off-by: Fengwei Yin <fengwei.yin@intel.com>
Change-Id: I1d4dbffe7bc7bda1d353c3a295dbf68d29f63158
The memchr implementation for 64 bit fails if these conditions occur:
- The buffer is 32 byte aligned.
- The buffer contains the character in the first byte.
- The count sent in is zero.
The function should return NULL, but it's not.
Bug: 16676625
Change-Id: Iab33cc7a8b79920350c72f054dff0e0a3cde69ce
Also fix a few formatting issues in copyright headers that were confusing
the script (though obviously it would be better if the script were smarter).
Change-Id: I7f561bef4f84fdcbd84f375ee226bd65db0e507b
In practice, with this implementation we never need to make a system call.
We get the main thread's tid (which is the same as our pid) back from
the set_tid_address system call we have to make during initialization.
A new pthread will have the same pid as its parent, and a fork child's
main (and only) thread will have a pid equal to its tid, which we get for
free from the kernel before clone returns.
The only time we'd actually have to make a getpid system call now is if
we take a signal during fork and the signal handler calls getpid. (That,
or we call getpid in the dynamic linker while it's still dealing with its
own relocations and hasn't even set up the main thread yet.)
Bug: 15387103
Change-Id: I6d4718ed0a5c912fc75b5f738c49a023dbed5189
Add 64-bit bionic implementation for denver. memcpy/memset are
denver-specific optimized. Use generic version of other routines.
Change-Id: I44a830e07b82b2986001d73d1540b4080aaa839b
vfork() was removed from POSIX 2008, so this replaces its implementation
with a call to fork().
Bug: 13935372
Change-Id: I6d99ac9e52a2efc5ee9bda1cab908774b830cedc
This patch removes the frame record created on svc calls.
Change-Id: I67cf926ba59540e824fb9749d30538e332df7c1e
Signed-off-by: Serban Constantinescu <serban.constantinescu@arm.com>
