The source code is reorganized following the order of the execution for
better readability. The order is as follows:
1) init
2) properties
3) module struct
4) deps mutator
5) post-deps mutator
6) generate build actions
7) module initialization for different sub types
8) misc (e.g. apex_available check, etc.)
Behavior is not touched.
Bug: 173472337
Test: m
Merged-In: I919fca468fa376273d498029e6ac2fa37998a4a6
Change-Id: I919fca468fa376273d498029e6ac2fa37998a4a6
Previous extra checks for ErrorProne were added using the plugins
proeprty to get them into the -processorpath argument. This works
fine for java-only modules, but fails for mixed java+kotlin modules
because the processorpath is given to kapt and not javac.
Add a dedicated errorprone.extra_check_modules property (mirroring
the lint.extra_check_modules property), and add that to a separate
processorpath that is used only for errorprone rules and not cleared
when kotlin is used.
Test: TestKapt/errorprone
Change-Id: Id6ef02ce758532d1df8b8d969fad83bb44fe93ab
Backgound: aog/919954 tried to handle
```
second line
```
but did it incorrectly. The parser works correctly (so this change
reverts aog/919954), it returns multiline comment, but the serializer
converting the internal representation to Blueprint was not emitting
'//' on the lines after the first.
Test: treehugger
Bug: 127521510
Change-Id: I0257a8b3cc4ffcaa6bea44113ceba66bb99d7e43
This method was added for use in sysprop_library.go but it is no longer
used there. So, this change removes it.
Bug: 173715943
Test: m nothing
Change-Id: I0c2ae8a8d515faf2692eca2aaed63475fdb6a196
Make sure every exported function or type has a godoc comment.
Also makes minor changes like unexporting functions that are not used
outside the package and fixing minor style warnings.
Bug: 173449605
Test: m checkbuild
Change-Id: I533a595d02035aae8b2b603590be639826d2d4c8
The framework-sdkextension java_sdk_library module defines an API for
public, system and module_lib API surfaces but the public API is empty.
The empty public API results in an empty .srcjar being repackaged and
merged into the sdkextension-sdk snapshot and results in no directory
for the public API stubs sources being created. Unfortunately, the
Android.bp file in the snapshot is created by Soong and it does not
know that the public API will be empty and so it creates an Android.bp
file that references the directory into which the stubs sources should
be added but which ends up not existing in the snapshot. Referencing a
non-existent directory causes a build failure.
This change fixes that issue by using PathForModuleSrc with no path
components to get the path to the module directory (which must exist)
and then resolving the module relative local src directory against
that. The local src directory is globbed to find all the files, which
will return an empty set of paths if the directory does not exist.
Finally, the file paths are passed as an rsp file to soong_zip to avoid
exceeding any command line limits.
Many other different approaches were considered:
* Adding a property to the java_sdk_library to indicate that the public
API was actually empty. That would require extra maintenance by
developers and would require some extra checks to be performed after
generating the stubs source to ensure that it was empty which would
complicate the build process.
* Creating a directory with some placeholder file (empty directories
don't work well with git) that would force the creation of the
directory. That file would most likely be created whether the API
was empty or not, would need to be stored in git alongside the source
and could be quite confusing to reviewers.
Bug: 173508731
Test: m nothing - to run new tests
Build sdkextension-sdk, unpack it and then build the .srcjar
files for the public, system and module_lib API surfaces.
Without this change the build failed, reporting that the
stubs_sources directory for the public API did not exist.
With this change the build succeeded.
Checked the contents of the resulting .srcjar files and made
sure that the public one was empty and the others contained
the SdkExtensions.java class and a package-info.java file.
Change-Id: Ia468a3f37349f2dbc21db67744bda6461498d515
This reverts commit 7f97957ded.
Reason for revert: breaks sdk snapshots b/173508731
Bug: 173508731
Test: Ran prebuilts/runtime/update.py and then m nothing
Before revert it failed
After revert it worked
Change-Id: I9c081681fac589e37788a0d592435e3224011c58
This CL also removes --warn_real_to_phony and --warn_phony_looks_real,
since --werror_real_to_phony and --wrror_phony_looks_real are already
specified.
Test: treehugger
Bug: 173474588
Change-Id: Icbb0f53182d1b912c62f8044f52bb79d985bf868
android_filesystem is a module type that can be used to create filesystem
images out of binaries built for Android. Its initial use will be for
creating an Android-like OS image to run on virtual machines, but the
use is not limited to it.
The module type currently lacks a lot of features like the support for
other filesystem types, and the ability to do something like signing the
image using avbtool, etc. Those will be added in follow-up CLs as we
have actual demands.
Bug: 172414391
Test: m
Change-Id: I4b779d4586e04d9a960688e73b711166708558ab
PackagingBase is the base struct that implements the basic packaging
functionalities. Here, packaging means grouping dependencies into an
output file where the built artifacts from the dependencies are placed
in a directory-like structure in the output file. The exact format of
the output file is irrelevant; it could be a filesystem image, tar.gz,
zip, or whatever.
PackagingBase is responsible for traversing the dependencies and copying
their outputs under the package root directory, which is expected to be
provided by the module type that includes PackagingBase. Then the
concrete module type is expected to do final step of converting the
package root directory into the output file of specific format.
Bug: 159685774
Bug: 172414391
Test: m dist out/dist/cvd-host_package.tar.gz
Change-Id: I5446eee4834ce3b6f0f5843d93bb330a26d42fe3
This change fixes a bug that zipsync didn't handle symlink correctly;
symlink was extracted as a regular file whose content is the target
path. Fixing the problem by correctly creating the symlink using
os.Symlink.
Bug: N/A
Test: manual
Change-Id: Ib6685c14e1950d1057d89672883cdd9e4879069a
* changes:
Store ndkKnownLibs in the config
Register the kythe singleton on the Context instead of globally
Store ninja file deps from PackageVarContext in the config
Store SingletonMakeVarsProviders in the config
More recent versions of make provide "else ifdef/ifndef/ifeq/ifneq" directive:
ifdef FOO
...
else ifdef BAR
...
endif
Fix the parser to handle it. It returns the same Directive as the respective ifxxx
counterpart, only that the Name is set to "elifdef/elifndef/elifeq/elifneq".
Test: treehugger
Change-Id: I74c6a2c7224bce1dd3465012fa84880fae21349b
Currently, installation of a module is defined as an action of copying
the built artifact of the module to an install path like out/soong/host
(for host modules) and out/target/product/<device>/<partition> (for
device modules). After the modules are installed, the installed files
are further processed to create packages like system.img, vendor.img,
cvd-host-package.tar.gz, etc.
This notion of installation seems to have originated from the old time
when system.img is the primary product of the entire build process
(modulo a few more like root.img). Packaging the installed files as the
filesystem image was considered as a post-build step then.
However, this model doesn't seem to fit well to the current and future
environment where we have a lot more filesystem images (system, vendor,
system_ext, product, ...). The filesystem images themselves are even
grouped together to form a higher-level filesystem image like super.img.
Furthermore, things like cvd-host-package.tar.gz requires us to be able
to group some of the host tools in a format that isn't filesystem image.
Lastly, we are expected to have more filesystem images that are subsets
of system.img (and their friends) for the Android-like mini OS that will
be running on on-device virtual machines. These all imply that the
packaging (which we call installation today) is not a global post-build
step, but a part of the build rules for creating the package-like
modules.
A model better fits to the new sitatuation might be this; a module
specifies its built artifact and the path where it should be placed. The
latter path is not rooted at out/. It's a relative path to the root
directory which will be determined by another module that implements the
packaging. For example, cc_library will have ./lib (or ./lib64), not
out/target/product/<device>/<partition>/lib as the path. Then packages
like system.img, cvd-host-package.tar.gz, etc. are explicitly modeled as
modules and they have deps to other modules. Then the modules are placed
at the relative path under the package root, and the entire root
directory finally is packaged as the output file (be it img, tar.gz, or
whatever).
PackagingSpec is the first step to implement the new model. It abstracts
a request to place a built artifact at a certain path in a package. It
has extra information about whether the path should be a symlink or not,
and whether the path is for an executable. It currently is created when
InstallFiles (and its friends) are called, and can be retrieved via
the new method PackagingSpecs().
In this CL, no one is using PackagingSpec. The installation is still
done by the existing rules created in InstallFiles, etc. and the
structs are not used for the filesystem images like system.img.
Bug: 159685774
Bug: 172414391
Test: m
Change-Id: Ie1dec72d1ac14382fc3b74e5c850472e9320d6a3
