Read VSR level from correct property. am: e5364d7617
Original change: https://googleplex-android-review.googlesource.com/c/platform/hardware/interfaces/+/18931908 Change-Id: Ie533b8429c1e923e2289c2b7fb89e1a2c48047e1 Signed-off-by: Automerger Merge Worker <android-build-automerger-merge-worker@system.gserviceaccount.com>
This commit is contained in:
commit
e81f6bbb11
2 changed files with 36 additions and 30 deletions
|
@ -388,25 +388,28 @@ bool avb_verification_enabled() {
|
||||||
}
|
}
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
int get_vsr_api_level() {
|
int get_vsr_api_level() {
|
||||||
int api_level = ::android::base::GetIntProperty("ro.board.api_level", -1);
|
int vendor_api_level = ::android::base::GetIntProperty("ro.vendor.api_level", -1);
|
||||||
if (api_level == -1) {
|
if (vendor_api_level != -1) {
|
||||||
api_level = ::android::base::GetIntProperty("ro.board.first_api_level", -1);
|
return vendor_api_level;
|
||||||
}
|
}
|
||||||
if (api_level == -1) {
|
|
||||||
api_level = ::android::base::GetIntProperty("ro.vndk.version", -1);
|
// Android S and older devices do not define ro.vendor.api_level
|
||||||
|
vendor_api_level = ::android::base::GetIntProperty("ro.board.api_level", -1);
|
||||||
|
if (vendor_api_level == -1) {
|
||||||
|
vendor_api_level = ::android::base::GetIntProperty("ro.board.first_api_level", -1);
|
||||||
}
|
}
|
||||||
// We really should have a VSR API level by now. But on cuttlefish, and perhaps other weird
|
|
||||||
// devices, we may not. So, we use the SDK first or current API level if needed. If this goes
|
int product_api_level = ::android::base::GetIntProperty("ro.product.first_api_level", -1);
|
||||||
// wrong, it should go wrong in the direction of being too strict rather than too lenient, which
|
if (product_api_level == -1) {
|
||||||
// should provoke someone to examine why we don't have proper VSR API level properties.
|
product_api_level = ::android::base::GetIntProperty("ro.build.version.sdk", -1);
|
||||||
if (api_level == -1) {
|
EXPECT_NE(product_api_level, -1) << "Could not find ro.build.version.sdk";
|
||||||
api_level = ::android::base::GetIntProperty("ro.product.first_api_level", -1);
|
|
||||||
}
|
}
|
||||||
if (api_level == -1) {
|
|
||||||
api_level = ::android::base::GetIntProperty("ro.build.version.sdk", -1);
|
// VSR API level is the minimum of vendor_api_level and product_api_level.
|
||||||
|
if (vendor_api_level == -1 || vendor_api_level > product_api_level) {
|
||||||
|
return product_api_level;
|
||||||
}
|
}
|
||||||
EXPECT_NE(api_level, -1) << "Could not find a VSR level, or equivalent.";
|
return vendor_api_level;
|
||||||
return api_level;
|
|
||||||
}
|
}
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
bool is_gsi() {
|
bool is_gsi() {
|
||||||
|
|
|
@ -1461,25 +1461,28 @@ void verify_subject(const X509* cert, //
|
||||||
}
|
}
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
int get_vsr_api_level() {
|
int get_vsr_api_level() {
|
||||||
int api_level = ::android::base::GetIntProperty("ro.board.api_level", -1);
|
int vendor_api_level = ::android::base::GetIntProperty("ro.vendor.api_level", -1);
|
||||||
if (api_level == -1) {
|
if (vendor_api_level != -1) {
|
||||||
api_level = ::android::base::GetIntProperty("ro.board.first_api_level", -1);
|
return vendor_api_level;
|
||||||
}
|
}
|
||||||
if (api_level == -1) {
|
|
||||||
api_level = ::android::base::GetIntProperty("ro.vndk.version", -1);
|
// Android S and older devices do not define ro.vendor.api_level
|
||||||
|
vendor_api_level = ::android::base::GetIntProperty("ro.board.api_level", -1);
|
||||||
|
if (vendor_api_level == -1) {
|
||||||
|
vendor_api_level = ::android::base::GetIntProperty("ro.board.first_api_level", -1);
|
||||||
}
|
}
|
||||||
// We really should have a VSR API level by now. But on cuttlefish, and perhaps other weird
|
|
||||||
// devices, we may not. So, we use the SDK first or current API level if needed. If this goes
|
int product_api_level = ::android::base::GetIntProperty("ro.product.first_api_level", -1);
|
||||||
// wrong, it should go wrong in the direction of being too strict rather than too lenient, which
|
if (product_api_level == -1) {
|
||||||
// should provoke someone to examine why we don't have proper VSR API level properties.
|
product_api_level = ::android::base::GetIntProperty("ro.build.version.sdk", -1);
|
||||||
if (api_level == -1) {
|
EXPECT_NE(product_api_level, -1) << "Could not find ro.build.version.sdk";
|
||||||
api_level = ::android::base::GetIntProperty("ro.product.first_api_level", -1);
|
|
||||||
}
|
}
|
||||||
if (api_level == -1) {
|
|
||||||
api_level = ::android::base::GetIntProperty("ro.build.version.sdk", -1);
|
// VSR API level is the minimum of vendor_api_level and product_api_level.
|
||||||
|
if (vendor_api_level == -1 || vendor_api_level > product_api_level) {
|
||||||
|
return product_api_level;
|
||||||
}
|
}
|
||||||
EXPECT_NE(api_level, -1) << "Could not find a VSR level, or equivalent.";
|
return vendor_api_level;
|
||||||
return api_level;
|
|
||||||
}
|
}
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
bool is_gsi_image() {
|
bool is_gsi_image() {
|
||||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in a new issue