unit tests
1, Previous implementation has the staged prop application done in
property_service, which caused a number of unnecessary changes which
including exposing apis like AddPersistentProperty. In addition, it made
the property_service logic complicated. A better design is to have the
staged value application done while reading the persistent properties
from file. This way, no change to property service. In addition, unit
test is much cleaner and efficient.
2, add a unit test to lock down the behavior. Specifically, it locks down that when a prop is staged, it should be applied the next time when the persistent prop is loaded. In addition, it should lock down that other persistent props are not overwritten.
Bug: b/307752841, b/300111812, b/306062513
Change-Id: I43c603efbb803195065dda3f0bc2145716302bbc
This fixes a bug introduced by I81b6bd984aad8f7ddec93ce74f4543e4f71be508
In the original CL, setting a sysprop `next_boot.<name>` and then
rebooting the device could remove all the persistent properties stored
in /data/property/persistent_properties. It happened because the
function `WritePersistentProperty` is called with a properties set which
is initialized as an empty set and then added with the properties which
had the next_boot prefix.
As a result...
Before the boot:
* persist.a = 1
* next_boot.b = 2
* next_boot.persist.c = 3
After the reboot:
* b = 2
* persist.c = 3
persist.a gets lost.
This change fixes the issue by populating properties set from the memory
and then save it to the file.
Bug: 306062513
Bug: 300111812
Test: do the following.
$ adb root
$ adb shell setprop persist.a 1
$ adb shell setprop next_boot.b 1
$ adb shell setprop next_boot.persist.c 1
$ adb reboot
$ adb shell getprop persist.a
1 // was (none) before this change
$ adb shell getprop b
1
$ adb shell getprop persist.c
1
$ adb reboot
$ adb shell getprop persist.a
1 // was (none) before this change
$ adb shell getprop b
// (none) because b isn't persisted. WAI.
$ adb shell getprop persist.c
1
Change-Id: I85d3777f9b32523b010e49b8ca53f4319dd2ce05
Now that Result<T> is actually expected<T, ...>, and the expected
proposal states expected<void, ...> as the way to indicate an expected
object that returns either successfully with no object or an error,
let's move init's Result<Success> to the preferred Result<void>.
Bug: 132145659
Test: boot, init unit tests
Change-Id: Ib2f98396d8e6e274f95a496fcdfd8341f77585ee
I probably should have done this from the start... There's a shim to
convert my manually serialized format to protobuf, and since that has
not yet shipped, it'll be reverted in a short period of time.
Test: init unit tests
Test: upgrade from legacy and intermediate property formats successfully
Change-Id: Iad25f6c30d0b44d294230a53dd6876222d1c785b
We have seen that storing persistent properties in separate files
causes increased boot latency compared to if they were stored in a
single contiguous file.
This change creates a simple format for a contiguously stored property
file, and adds the support for arbitrary characters in the names of
persistent properties, which previously had been restricted. It has a
mechanism for converting older devices to the new format as well.
Bug: 64392887
Test: boot bullhead with new properties
Test: boot bullhead and verify old properties are converted to the new
property file
Test: corrupt property file and ensure that it gets recovered from memory
Test: new unit tests
Change-Id: I60d8201d655ce5c97b33faae81d5ca8dbbb21a14
