This reverts commit 78f806198f.
There is no code that reads this system property, logcat already shows
whether the FS keyring is being used, and all devices launching with
Android 11 and later are guaranteed to use the FS keyring anyway.
Bug: 154327249
Change-Id: Id906efedd89d5bcac5370fb141cdbf7848932d95
vold_prepare_subdirs should create apexdata directories for each APEX.
Previously, it gets the list by scanning /apex directory. However,
vold/vold_prepare_subdirs run in the bootstrap mount namespace, they can
see only bootstrap apexes in /apex. The reason why it worked was that
unintended side effects of how we managed /apex directory for both mount
namespace.
Instead, since apexdata directories are already populated by init in
/data/misc/apexdata, we can use that directory for the same purpose.
Bug: 295345486
Test: CtsPackageSettingHostTestCases
Change-Id: I453cd59f54ccbb140f73b5e8576b36fa49f9bc59
Userspace reboot turned out to be a dead end and is no longer supported.
Therefore, remove the code from vold that handled keeping CE storage
unlocked past the userdata filesystem being unmounted and mounted.
This is a revert of commit 1c6731c649 (https://r.android.com/1254615)
with various conflicts resolved.
Bug: 292469129
Ignore-AOSP-First: Conflicts. Will cherry-pick after Android 14 push...
Change-Id: If530edaf7c1566dd3bd8b1322f935f38a2e66beb
Adoptable storage CE and DE keys were not being explicitly evicted,
resulting in the benefits of key eviction not being fully realized on
devices that use adoptable storage. Fix this by evicting the adoptable
storage keys when the corresponding internal storage keys are evicted:
- In lockUserKey, evict the CE keys for adoptable storage volumes, not
just the CE key for internal storage as was done before.
- In destroyUserKey, evict the user's CE and DE keys for adoptable
storage, not just the internal storage keys as was done before.
To make this possible, starting keeping track of the EncryptionPolicy of
each currently installed adoptable storage key.
(This CL is reworked from https://r.android.com/2660878,
original author Arnab Sen <arnabse@amazon.com>)
Test: On Cuttlefish with config_multiuserMaxRunningUsers changed to 1:
sm set-virtual-disk true
sm partition disk:7,416 private
pm create-user 10
am start-user 10
am stop-user 10
# Verified that this fails with "Required key not available".
touch /mnt/expand/f1ad173b-d6d9-4948-8eb7-ccdd7b053b22/misc_ce/10/foo.txt
am start-user 10
pm remove-user 10
# Checked for all the expected "Evicted fscrypt key" messages.
# 2 from when user was stopped, and 4 from when user was removed.
adb logcat | grep Evicted
Ignore-AOSP-First: Conflicts. Will cherry-pick after Android 14 push...
Change-Id: I7f11a135d8550618cd96013f834cebd54be5ef84
Erasing a key from s_new_ce_keys is equivalent to destroying it, so it
shouldn't be done when the key is merely being evicted.
This didn't matter in practice since eviction requests don't come in
before the key gets persisted, but fix this to avoid confusion.
Ignore-AOSP-First: Conflicts. Will cherry-pick after Android 14 push...
Test: see I7f11a135d8550618cd96013f834cebd54be5ef84
Change-Id: I28412f243925b5a7242449b617fe9de9c90912b6
Everything in FsCrypt.cpp seems to run under VolumeManager::mCryptLock,
except for fscrypt_destroy_volume_keys() which uses mLock instead.
This was sort of okay because fscrypt_destroy_volume_keys() didn't
operate on any in-memory data structures. However, that is going to be
changed. Therefore, rework VoldNativeService::forgetPartition() to call
fscrypt_destroy_volume_keys() under mCryptLock.
Ignore-AOSP-First: Conflicts. Will cherry-pick after Android 14 push...
Test: see I7f11a135d8550618cd96013f834cebd54be5ef84
Change-Id: Ia27a61faf2fdd546cdbddb2a3985c7c6696f6aa6
No change in behavior, except for removing a redundant check of
's_ce_policies.count(user_id)' and removing an extra ERROR message.
Ignore-AOSP-First: Conflicts. Will cherry-pick after Android 14 push...
Test: see I7f11a135d8550618cd96013f834cebd54be5ef84
Change-Id: If221e23991e8e04138ae7dbdafe8160b00893655
In this change, the logic to get the list of apexes is replaced with
the query to apexservice, which is the source of truth. This dedups
the manual scanning of /apex for the apex list, which should be
internal to apexd. (Note how vold_prepare_subdirs filtered out
directories with "@" character).
This also makes vold_prepare_subdirs immune to the upcoming changes:
/apex directory containing only bootstrap APEXes in the bootstrap NS.
Until now, getting the list of apexes by scanning /apex was okay
because of the accidental fact that /apex directory has directories
for all the apexes, not only bootstrap apexes.
Bug: 293949266
Bug: 293546778
Test: CtsPackageSettingHostTestCases
Change-Id: I3fe373ca6f4c2281439bb2449845a1a14357131e
Newer versions of libc++ check that an allocator can be rebound to the
same element type. We need to add a rebind member to ZeroingAllocator
to fix this compiler error:
prebuilts/clang/host/linux-x86/clang-r498229/include/c++/v1/vector:376:19: error: static assertion failed due to requirement 'is_same<android::vold::ZeroingAllocator, std::allocator<char>>::value': [allocator.requirements] states that rebinding an allocator to the same type should result in the original allocator
static_assert(is_same<allocator_type, __rebind_alloc<__alloc_traits, value_type> >::value,
^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
It likely doesn't matter in practice because this allocator is only
used with std::vector, which probably doesn't use allocator rebinding,
because it won't allocate an internal node type (e.g. unlike std::map,
std::list, etc).
Alternatively, ZeroingAllocator could be changed to a
ZeroingAllocator<T> that can zero arbitrary types, but it doesn't seem
necessary currently, and types other than char wouldn't be used.
Bug: b/175635923
Test: treehugger
Change-Id: I42e9d8f02a18637fc67e94cc1358d2ed733a7268
when the idlemaint run is working, if two or more idlemaint abort concurrency are working.
all idlemaint abort will hold the wakelock, until idlemaint run finished,
but it just nofity one idlemaint abort thread to stop and release the wakelock.
Remaining idlemaint abort threads will hold the wakelock until next idlemaint run to notify them.
Bug: 292383791
Test: see the issue Description
Change-Id: I5312be2e0e92c41483cab26e627a4ae562e5aed8
